|
Now that the New York Times has reported that older workers make good employees, (For a Good Retirement, Find Work. Good Luck) I guess employers around the country will take heed. As if.
In spite of the fact that the frightening prospects of 78 million or so of my fellow Baby Boomers leaving the work force en masse and straining the resources of an eviscerated Social Security (eviscerated because the federal government keeps “borrowing” from the Social Security trust fund) would not come to pass if baby boomers kept working, there is no pressure on employers to find a way to retain older workers. And just so you know, survey after survey indicate that baby boomers want to continue working.
Much like cases of past employment discrimination (by race and gender) stereotypes rule the day. Among the excuses proffered by HR departments (many of whom are instructed to ignore resumes from people older than 40): Older workers lack energy, are old fogeys (translated: don’t understand technology) and are old and sick. Yeah, and older workers -- aged around 50 -- don’t have to plan around young families, were there at the beginning of the digital revolution, and are healthier for the most part than their Gen-X counterparts. So there.
So, much as I hate the idea, I think that as in the case of employment discrimination by race and gender, the government is going to have to step in and help us fogeys get a gig. My suggestion, however, is not to use a stick -- as in bringing lawsuits against companies -- but the carrot of financial incentives such as underwriting health insurance.
And you youngun’s out there reading, remember this: the longer we’re working, the less money we’ll need for social security and the more there will be for you.
 |
I have at least ten years before I hit actual retirement age, and I hope I will have a choice of whether to keep working or not. I'm 55 now and every day I see at least one opportunity to learn something new and fascinating. And I speak for many others my age.